Eight out of ten impairment rating reports contain errors. That figure comes from an independent review of thousands of IR reports, and it is not an outlier. It accurately reflects what happens when physicians perform a complex, specialized task without specialized training. Most of these errors are not intentional. They are the predictable result of applying a technically demanding methodology without adequate preparation.
Here are the six most common errors and what to do instead.
Error 1: Using the Wrong Edition of the AMA Guides
The applicable edition of the AMA Guides depends on the jurisdiction of the claim, not the edition the physician trained on or prefers. Nevada mandates the 5th Edition by statute. California mandates the 5th Edition for workers' compensation. Other states have adopted the 6th Edition. Some specify no edition. Using the wrong edition for a jurisdiction is not a technical imprecision. It is a legally incorrect report.
Error 2: Rating Before MMI
An impairment rating performed before the patient has reached Maximum Medical Improvement (MMI) is premature. The AMA Guides are explicit: impairment ratings should be performed after MMI, when the condition has stabilized and no further recovery is expected. A rating produced before MMI will not accurately reflect permanent functional loss and is vulnerable to challenge on that basis alone.
Error 3: Applying the Wrong Diagnostic Method
The AMA Guides specify which diagnostic methods apply to which conditions and body regions. For spinal impairment, for example, the 5th Edition offers both the Diagnosis-Related Estimates (DRE) method and the Range of Motion (ROM) method, and the Guides specify which applies in which circumstances. Using ROM when DRE applies, or vice versa, produces an incorrect WPI and a report that will not survive expert scrutiny.
Error 4: Inadequate Documentation
A rating that relies primarily on the patient's self-reported symptoms, without supporting diagnostic testing, imaging, or physical examination findings, is legally vulnerable. The report must document what was examined, what was found, and specifically which tables and pages of the Guides were applied.
This is the area where reports most often fail in litigation. "I examined the patient and found" is not adequate documentation. "I measured cervical flexion at 40 degrees per the protocol in AMA Guides 5th Edition, Chapter 15, Table 15-7" is.
Error 5: Apportionment Errors
Apportionment (separating impairment from the current injury from pre-existing conditions) is one of the most technically demanding aspects of impairment rating and one of the most frequently done incorrectly. Physicians either fail to apportion when they should, apportion without adequate documentation, or apportion using methodology that does not match the applicable edition of the Guides. In Nevada, apportionment is further governed by NRS 616C.099, which narrows what the Guides permit.
Error 6: Crossing Into Disability Determination
Impairment and disability are distinct. A report that uses disability language (declaring that the patient "cannot work" or "is disabled") has stepped outside the physician's role. These statements are legal conclusions the physician is not qualified to make, and they give opposing counsel an opening to challenge the entire report.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an impairment rating report be corrected after it's submitted?
It depends on the jurisdiction and the stage of the legal process. In some cases, an addendum or supplemental report can address specific errors. In others, the original report stands and becomes the subject of expert challenge. Getting it right the first time is always preferable.
What happens if opposing counsel identifies an error in my report?
Depending on the error and the jurisdiction, the report may be challenged, excluded, or used to undermine the physician's credibility. A physician who can articulate their methodology and documentation is far better positioned to defend their findings.
Is there a way to reduce errors before submitting a report?
Yes. WholePerson® Impairment Rating Software guides physicians through the correct diagnostic protocol for each body region and performs WPI calculations with full AMA Guides references, reducing the risk of the most common calculation and documentation errors.
The 8-out-of-10 error rate is not inevitable. CIRS™ certification through AAEME is the most comprehensive impairment rating training available, covering the 5th and 6th editions of the AMA Guides with CME/CEU credit.
Learn More →